I Don't Approve My Tax Dollars to do That: Free-for-All Military Spending

In the United States, the first Tuesday in November is probably the most famous day of the month in the United States behind Black Friday and Thanksgiving. That day, which happens to be today, is Election Day. By the end of the night, we [hopefully] will know our leader of the next four years, if voting goes as planned. We shall see if that actually pans out.

Although both presidential candidates have attempted to distinguish themselves over the course of the campaign, portions of their policies line up with one another. One example is that Obama and Romney have both promised to increase the defense budget. As a twenty-year-old with residual resentment about the Iraq War, I’m tired of hearing out expansion of military spending. Problems here at home need urgent attention too, not just those abroad. Imagine my surprise when I read an article posted by my politics professor in which a Marine reserve officer actually agreed with me.

Huh?

In his op-ed column for the New York Times, Aaron B. O’Connell compares our country’s present relationship with the military to that at the end Eisenhower’s presidency. Eisenhower warned of the military becoming too large of an influence in political and domestic affairs, becoming a epicenter around which all other policies would circle, defense-related or not. He pointed out that few of his Naval Academy students remember when America was not at war. I cannot say I recall when a time bombings, death tolls, yellow ribbons and camouflage were not daily contributors on the nightly news. O’Connell claims that service is glorified in the media through television shows and video games. Various military-related demonstrations precede major sporting events. When did we, the civilian population, become so obsessed with our nation’s unequivocal military might?

Particularly popular after 9/11 and the immediate outbreak of the Iraq War, the yellow ribbon, a symbol of supporting the troops and thus being a "good" American, is seen everywhere from trees to cars to businesses. I remember in 5th grade tying yellow ribbons around tree trunks outside of my elementary school in 2003. Now such practice in a public school would bother me. We ten and eleven year olds were not given an option not to support our troops. We just did. In essence we were brainwashed: that the military going to war was a good thing. War is never a good thing. 

How much the US devoted to military expenditures in 2012 compared to the world's other leading nations. The sum of China, Russia, the UK and France's spending barely exceeds half of what the US alone spends in a year. How much of what we spend is really necessary? 

Photo credit: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_countries_by_military_expenditures

The most interesting aspect of O’Connell’s op-ed however was his critique of the excessive military spending. I assumed that as an officer he would be all for more money and resources. He is not. In fact, he calls for increased skepticism and criticism from Congress. The majority of representatives and senators have no military background, trapping them in a dangerous Catch-22: criticize the military without the proper credentials and be deemed un-patriotic or provide “unhesitating adulation” and allow military spending to balloon out of control. Guess which choice leads to re-election (http://www.nytimes.com/2012/11/05/opinion/the-permanent-militarization-of-america.html?ref=opinion).

The concept of trade-offs in terms of spending often gets lost among political jargon and election ads. When we appropriate funds for one project, another project inevitably loses them. We devote more money to the military, chances are that gets taken from other areas at home. Instead of working to pay off the deficit, we build more tanks. Rather than reduce the cost of a higher education, we establish more bases. Money does not just magically appear; it all comes from somewhere and more importantly, it is a finite amount. Regardless of the outcome of today’s election, I hope our next president will weed out the military budget with the guidance of those who know the industry best. It’s time we bring the troops and the money home.

Increased military spending for the few years after the 9/11 attacks does not come as a surprise. But ten years after the fall of the Twin Towers, why are we still increasing the budget? 

Photo credit: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:U.S._Defense_Spending_Trends.png 

I don’t approve my tax dollars to do that: free-for-all military spending  

I Don't Approve My Tax Dollars to do That: Go to War (again)

Anyone who pays marginal attention to the news knows China and Japan are teetering on the precipice of major conflict. They are disputing the ownership of a little set of islands in the East China Sea, known as the Daiyuo Islands in China and Senkaku Islands in Japan.

Defense Secretary Leon Panetta implores the United States to remain neutral. However since my fellow Millenials and I already face over $3 trillion dollars in wars that we had had no say in waging, now that I can vote I want to make my opinion loud and clear: no war (Ferraro 2012, Mount Holyoke College).  

Political jargon aside, this is a lot of money. 

Photo credit: http://www.peaceway.net/images/signs/PeaceWaysigns5.gif

Growing up watching ABC World News Tonight with Peter Jennings, I heard the saying, “children pay for their parents’ wars.” It was most likely 2002, following the September 11^th attacks and President Bush was advocating invasion of Iraq. When I complained about the cost that would inevitably be dumped upon my generation long after the war ended, my parents, both born in the early 50’s countered that they experienced a similar situation. They had not voted for or against Vietnam yet they paid for it. In fact, they even protested against it and still paid for it. It is an inextricable cycle.

This graph shows the steady increase in DOO budget compared to the 2000, pre-9/11 budget. The amount spent on oversea contingency wars does not steadily increase but rather drops down around 2009 when Obama took office. Since then it has once again steadily risen though not to the degree at which it rose during President Bush's presidency. 
Photo Credit: https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEgVMxM0w78aI64W-0T82xqBxRIjgEVM5eJEZJLF_xdhTEs0tpsjjrrjfbuFLWZkhywuy_BhXZs9nS5klvpVzfWGQgAbxHiKymElmyiErduiPXUo7pkb5NVdmYCvPGsR9Lt4W1Ofpohyphenhyphen5A_T/

I do not agree with this cycle. How is it fair that a group of people has to pay for something it had no say in? Yes, I realize the simple answer is “Life is not fair.” But there has to be a way to finance a current generation’s experience without drowning the next generation in debt. My immediate thought is to insist that the Federal Government not spend money it does not have. This prevents excessive interest costs as well as excessive expenditures. But realistically, can a nation afford to be stingy in a time of war? Not if it expects to win.

Another alternative is to lower the voting age. Some may argue that since an American is not considered an adult in the legal sense until he or she is eighteen, he or she should not be eligible to vote. Can you really quantify an age at which a person is competent to vote? Part of me believes age is irrelevant: you should be allowed to vote when you make an effort to get educated about the issues and can make an informed decision. One could argue that based on that standard, many Americans do not deserve their vote. So why not allow a fourteen year old to vote? The future is theirs too.

Significantly fewer members of the rising or incoming generation vote compared to members of the generation currently in power and the one that just relinquished it. In my opinion, their votes are significantly less imperative than those of the rising generation because it is the rising generation who will primarily be affected by whatever policies passed. 
Photo credit: http://seniorjournal.com/NEWS/Politics/PrcntByAge.gif

I don’t presently have a satisfactory solution to prevent children from financing their parents’ wars. But what I can and will do is be cognizant of my decisions as a voter will affect both my and my children’s financial future. They should not have to pay for my mistakes – literally.

Thus far it seems as though the conflict between Japan and China will diffuse. Regardless, I do not approve my tax dollars to get involved in a war between Japan and China. Moreover, I do not approve my tax dollars to fund another war until the soldiers in Afghanistan come home.